[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BEBD180.3040404@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 12:16:32 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: generic adaptive large memory allocation APIs
On 05/13/2010 11:40 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>>> Anyway as this is a replacement for explicit tests, it shouldn't change
>>>> the behaviour in any way. Obviously when a user doesn't need virtually
>>>> contiguous space, he shouldn't use this interface at all.
>>>
>>> Why can't we make fdtable virtually contiguous free?
>>
>> This is possible, but the question is why to make the code more complex?
>
> because it's broken.
Well, could you explain what exactly is broken about
x = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!x)
x = vmalloc(size);
? Is is that kmalloc doesn't return until is has the memory to return
when asking for order(size) <= COSTLY_ORDER? I think this is expected.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists