[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100513121745.GA10749@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 13:17:45 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, magnus.damm@...il.com,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Geoff Smith <geoffx.smith@...el.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...csson.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:35:30PM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> Figuring out a different way to do this should not limit Android at all,
> since Google can do what other Linux distributions do and continue to
> patch opportunistic suspend/suspend-block calls into their kernels as
> needed to ship devices, while contributing towards a different solution to
> the problem.
I basically agree, except that despite having a year to do so none of us
have come up with a different way that would actually work. Google have
done this work. Who's going to prove that there is actually a different
way to do this?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists