[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1273756816.5605.3547.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 15:20:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] mm: add generic adaptive large memory allocation
APIs
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 17:51 +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> +void *__kvmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> +{
> + void *ptr;
> +
> + if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
> + return kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | flags);
> + size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> + if (is_power_of_2(size))
> + ptr = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL | flags |
> + __GFP_NOWARN, get_order(size));
> + else
> + ptr = alloc_pages_exact(size, GFP_KERNEL | flags |
> + __GFP_NOWARN);
> + if (ptr != NULL) {
> + virt_to_head_page(ptr)->private = size;
> + return ptr;
> + }
> +
> + ptr = vmalloc(size);
> + if (ptr != NULL && (flags & __GFP_ZERO))
> + memset(ptr, 0, size);
> +
> + return ptr;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kvmalloc);
So if I do kvmalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC) I get GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ATOMIC, which
is not a recommended variation because one should not mix __GFP_WAIT and
__GFP_HIGH.
So I would simply drop the gfp argument to avoid confusion.
> +void __kvfree(void *ptr, bool inatomic)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(ptr)))
> + return;
> + if (is_vmalloc_addr(ptr)) {
> + if (inatomic) {
> + struct work_struct *work;
> +
> + work = ptr;
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct work_struct) > PAGE_SIZE);
> + INIT_WORK(work, kvfree_work);
> + schedule_work(work);
> + } else {
> + vfree(ptr);
> + }
> + } else {
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + page = virt_to_head_page(ptr);
> + if (PageSlab(page) || PageCompound(page))
> + kfree(ptr);
> + else if (is_power_of_2(page->private))
> + free_pages((unsigned long)ptr,
> + get_order(page->private));
> + else
> + free_pages_exact(ptr, page->private);
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kvfree);
NAK, I really utterly dislike that inatomic argument. The alloc side
doesn't function in atomic context either. Please keep the thing
symmetric in that regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists