[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100513084100.d06b266b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 08:41:00 -0400
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Btrfs: add basic DIO read/write support V3
On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:31:45 -0400 Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:14:30AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:40:53PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > V1->V2
> > > -Use __blockdev_direct_IO instead of helper
> > > -Use KM_IRQ0 for kmap instead of KM_USER0
> >
> > I still don't think this is correct. The completion can come from
> > softirq and hardirq context, and possibly even normal process context.
> > You either need to check for all these, or you need to use the generic
> > complete in user context helper btrfs has available for other types
> > of I/O.
> >
>
> AIO's aio_complete does kmap with KM_IRQ0/1 and it gets called in the same
> context as the btrfs completion handler, so if it's ok for aio_complete it
> should be ok for btrfs right? Thanks,
>
Using KM_USERx from irq context is a horrid, horrid bug.
Using KM_IRQx with local interrupts enabled is a ditto.
It's OK to use KM_IRQx from process context as long as local interrupts
are disabled.
kmap slots are just per-cpu variables. Each one has a particular usage
convention: process-context-only, must-be-irq-safe, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists