[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100513084335.7267bcf5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 08:43:35 -0400
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Fix O_NOFOLLOW behavior for paths with trailing
slashes
On Thu, 13 May 2010 17:41:35 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Thu 13-05-10 08:24:59, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 13 May 2010, Jan Kara wrote:
> > >
> > > According to specification
> > > mkdir d; ln -s d a; open("a/", O_NOFOLLOW | O_RDONLY)
> > > should return success but currently it did return ELOOP. Fix the code to ignore
> > > O_NOFOLLOW in case the provided path has trailing slashes. This is a regression
> > > caused by path lookup cleanup patch series.
> > >
> > > CC: stable@...nel.org
> >
> > Hmm? Is this correct? Isn't the bug introduced in this merge window, and
> > thus not relevant for stable?
> Ah, you're right! I've seen dates in the patches around December so I
> automatically thought the series went to 2.6.33 but checking git logs and
> the actual source code of 2.6.33 it went in later. I'm sorry for the
> confusion.
Yes, it's a bit tricky (for me, at least) to work out "which kernel version did
that patch go into" via git.
I just keep lots of kernel trees around and poke about with `patch
--dry-run'. PITA.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists