[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimLKfPHI81K_-N7gIkDXgenqOzNQlTvGFlCutvi@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 17:51:45 +0200
From: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: perf: relative path to source for perf probe?
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...stprotocols.net> wrote:
> Probably you won't find this if you look at the old 2.6.34 codebase
> (yay, for tools/perf it is already hundreds of patches behind :-)), so
> I recomend you look at what we have in linux-2.6-tip, branch
> tip/perf/core, what is in 2.6.34 is in tip/perf/urgent and right now,
> IIRC, just a one patch that is not in 2.6.34 proper, a cherry-pick from
> tip/perf/core, no less :-)
Where are these branches? I've looked at:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/linux-2.6.git;a=summary
but I don't see these branches listed.
Thanks for the pointers!
-- Chase
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists