[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100513173623.GL19192@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 14:36:23 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: perf: relative path to source for perf probe?
Em Thu, May 13, 2010 at 05:51:45PM +0200, Chase Douglas escreveu:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@...stprotocols.net> wrote:
> > Probably you won't find this if you look at the old 2.6.34 codebase
> > (yay, for tools/perf it is already hundreds of patches behind :-)), so
> > I recomend you look at what we have in linux-2.6-tip, branch
> > tip/perf/core, what is in 2.6.34 is in tip/perf/urgent and right now,
> > IIRC, just a one patch that is not in 2.6.34 proper, a cherry-pick from
> > tip/perf/core, no less :-)
>
> Where are these branches? I've looked at:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/linux-2.6.git;a=summary
>
> but I don't see these branches listed.
Well, if you decide to go from my tree, its all in the "perf" branch,
but I'd recommend you follow Ingo, my git tree, at the moment, is just a
conduit to get things out to him, which happens without noticeable delay
once I send a pull request.
> Thanks for the pointers!
You're welcome, please let us know about any other thing we may be of
help to make you of help to us ;-)
> -- Chase
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists