[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100513185844.GA5959@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 11:58:44 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com,
shaohui.zheng@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC, 6/7] NUMA hotplug emulator
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:49:38AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 11:15 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > echo "physical_address=0x40000000 numa_node=3" > memory/probe
> > >
> > > I'd *GREATLY* prefer that over this new syntax. The existing mechanism
> > > is obtuse enough, and the ',3' makes it more so.
> > >
> > > We should have the code around to parse arguments like that, too, since
> > > we use it for the boot command-line.
> >
> > If you are going to be doing something like this, please use configfs,
> > that is what it is designed for, not sysfs.
>
> That's probably a really good point, especially since configfs didn't
> even exist when we made this 'probe' file thingy. It never was a great
> fit for sysfs anyway.
Really? configfs was added in 2.6.16, when was this probe file added?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists