| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100513195547.GK2879@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 12:55:47 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...ay.de.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 23/23] vhost: add __rcu annotations
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 07:50:50AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:00:57PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:48:47AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 02:33:42PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...ay.de.ibm.com>
> > > >
> > > > Also add rcu_dreference_protected() for code paths where locks are held.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> > >
> > > Maybe long lines can be fixed? Otherwise looks ok.
> >
> > Done. I introduced locals to make it fit.
>
> Just pls check this does not lead to unused variable
> warnings when the whole lockdep is off.
Will do! It should not, because the assignment happens independently
of lockdep, but I will nevertheless build both ways.
I am also merging in Peter Zijlstra's suggestion of leveraging the
existing lockdep on workqueues.
Thanx, Paul
> > One other thing... We need some API that says "we are running in the
> > context of a work queue." Otherwise, we will get false positives when
> > called in a work queue without locks held.
> >
> > Any thoughts? One approach would be to create a separate lockdep class
> > for vhost workqueue state, similar to the approach used in instrument
> > rcu_read_lock() and friends.
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/vhost/net.c | 11 ++++++++---
> > > > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 14 ++++++++------
> > > > drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 4 ++--
> > > > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > > > index 9777583..945c5cb 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > > > @@ -364,7 +364,10 @@ static void vhost_net_disable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
> > > > static void vhost_net_enable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
> > > > struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> > > > {
> > > > - struct socket *sock = vq->private_data;
> > > > + struct socket *sock;
> > > > +
> > > > + sock = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
> > > > + lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
> > > > if (!sock)
> > > > return;
> > > > if (vq == n->vqs + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX) {
> > > > @@ -380,7 +383,8 @@ static struct socket *vhost_net_stop_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
> > > > struct socket *sock;
> > > >
> > > > mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> > > > - sock = vq->private_data;
> > > > + sock = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
> > > > + lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
> > > > vhost_net_disable_vq(n, vq);
> > > > rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, NULL);
> > > > mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> > > > @@ -518,7 +522,8 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /* start polling new socket */
> > > > - oldsock = vq->private_data;
> > > > + oldsock = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
> > > > + lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
> > > > if (sock == oldsock)
> > > > goto done;
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > > index e69d238..fc0c077 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ long vhost_dev_reset_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > > > vhost_dev_cleanup(dev);
> > > >
> > > > memory->nregions = 0;
> > > > - dev->memory = memory;
> > > > + RCU_INIT_POINTER(dev->memory, memory);
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -212,8 +212,9 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > > > fput(dev->log_file);
> > > > dev->log_file = NULL;
> > > > /* No one will access memory at this point */
> > > > - kfree(dev->memory);
> > > > - dev->memory = NULL;
> > > > + kfree(rcu_dereference_protected(dev->memory,
> > > > + lockdep_is_held(&dev->mutex)));
> > > > + RCU_INIT_POINTER(dev->memory, NULL);
> > > > if (dev->mm)
> > > > mmput(dev->mm);
> > > > dev->mm = NULL;
> > > > @@ -294,14 +295,14 @@ static int vq_access_ok(unsigned int num,
> > > > /* Caller should have device mutex but not vq mutex */
> > > > int vhost_log_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > > > {
> > > > - return memory_access_ok(dev, dev->memory, 1);
> > > > + return memory_access_ok(dev, rcu_dereference_protected(dev->memory, lockdep_is_held(&dev->mutex)), 1);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /* Verify access for write logging. */
> > > > /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */
> > > > static int vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, void __user *log_base)
> > > > {
> > > > - return vq_memory_access_ok(log_base, vq->dev->memory,
> > > > + return vq_memory_access_ok(log_base, rcu_dereference_protected(vq->dev->memory, lockdep_is_held(&dev->mutex)),
> > > > vhost_has_feature(vq->dev, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) &&
> > > > (!vq->log_used || log_access_ok(log_base, vq->log_addr,
> > > > sizeof *vq->used +
> > > > @@ -342,7 +343,8 @@ static long vhost_set_memory(struct vhost_dev *d, struct vhost_memory __user *m)
> > > >
> > > > if (!memory_access_ok(d, newmem, vhost_has_feature(d, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)))
> > > > return -EFAULT;
> > > > - oldmem = d->memory;
> > > > + oldmem = rcu_dereference_protected(d->memory,
> > > > + lockdep_is_held(&d->mutex));
> > > > rcu_assign_pointer(d->memory, newmem);
> > > > synchronize_rcu();
> > > > kfree(oldmem);
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > > > index 44591ba..240396c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > > > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
> > > > * work item execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock() and the end of
> > > > * work item execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock().
> > > > * Writers use virtqueue mutex. */
> > > > - void *private_data;
> > > > + void __rcu *private_data;
> > > > /* Log write descriptors */
> > > > void __user *log_base;
> > > > struct vhost_log log[VHOST_NET_MAX_SG];
> > > > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct vhost_dev {
> > > > /* Readers use RCU to access memory table pointer
> > > > * log base pointer and features.
> > > > * Writers use mutex below.*/
> > > > - struct vhost_memory *memory;
> > > > + struct vhost_memory __rcu *memory;
> > > > struct mm_struct *mm;
> > > > struct mutex mutex;
> > > > unsigned acked_features;
> > > > --
> > > > 1.7.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists