linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100513203654.GA14528@tango.0pointer.de>
Date:	Thu, 13 May 2010 22:36:54 +0200
From:	Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
	James Kosin <jkosin@...comgrp.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	jsafrane@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets

On Thu, 13.05.10 13:06, Paul Menage (menage@...gle.com) wrote:

> 
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Lennart Poettering
> <mzxreary@...inter.de> wrote:
> > By default systemd will create its groups in the "debug" hierarchy, (at
> > least for now, in the long run i'd like to see "noop" hierarchy or so,
> > that doesn't sound so temporary), since that controller is not useful
> 
> If you just want to track processes, mount a (named) hierarchy with no
> attached subsystems.

Oh, that is possible? How would I do that? 

This certainly doesn't work:

# mount waldo -t cgroup /tmp/xxxx -o defaults

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/