[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100513222425.GC16989@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:24:25 -0400
From: tytso@....edu
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
magnus.damm@...il.com, mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Geoff Smith <geoffx.smith@...el.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 02:25:56PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > I agree and I don't understand the problem that people have with the
> > opportunistic suspend feature.
>
> It seems to be picking quite a few comments for one.
It's picking up a lot of comments because *someone* seems to be trying
to use a "last post wins" style of argumentation. One of the things
that is hard for people who aren't regular denizens of LKML is to
understand whose comments can be ignored.....
Seriously, you are posting a lot, but it's not clear you're making any
clear sense...
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists