| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <i2q8d20b11a1005121954l4c8e59al5487c2e34b0fcad3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 19:54:33 -0700 From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>, Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] rwsem: smaller wrappers around rwsem_down_failed_common On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:42 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote: > Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> wrote: > >> Following change also enjoys having flags available in a register rather >> than having to fish it out in the struct rwsem_waiter... > > So what? It doesn't use flags in rwsem_down_failed_common(). I meant patch 10 wants to use the flags in order to know whether to queue at the head or tail of the waiter list. Apologies for the compile error, patches 8 and 10 used to be a single change and were split off relatively late. :/ -- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists