[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1273819904.5605.3562.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 08:51:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
James Kosin <jkosin@...comgrp.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, menage@...gle.com,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jsafrane@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 02:02 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Will it still work with a CONFIG_CGROUP=n kernel? I see distributions
> > deteriorate, you cannot even boot a raw bzImage kernel without initrd on
> > most distros (sure, its not too hard to fix, but still).
>
> No it won't work without cgroups.
I guess we'll finally have an answer for people on #kernelnewbies on
what distro is best suited for kernel development :-)
> > Requiring CONFIG_CGROUP=y to even get init running seems like a final
> > straw to ensure nobody will ever get anything to boot these days.
>
> Well, I wasn't aware that cgroups is now in the kernel for the purpose
> that people should *not* use it.
Init using the bare minimum possible only seems like a sensible thing.
Once the basic stuff is running you can detect whats available and use
it if needed/wanted.
I very often build a CONFIG_CGROUP=n kernel, I simply strip down
my .config to the bare minimum because that builds fastest.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists