[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1273821821.5605.3572.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 09:23:41 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
James Kosin <jkosin@...comgrp.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, menage@...gle.com,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jsafrane@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 08:51 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Init using the bare minimum possible only seems like a sensible thing.
> Once the basic stuff is running you can detect whats available and use
> it if needed/wanted.
I really think init should be able to run regardless of any CONFIG_*
option. The only thing that should avoid init from running is not being
able to mount the filesystem with init on it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists