linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 May 2010 13:42:48 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
	James Kosin <jkosin@...comgrp.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, menage@...gle.com,
	jsafrane@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2010-05-14 08:53:48]:

> On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 11:13 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
> > I think the config options are the domains of the distributors 
> 
> Whoever runs a distro kernel anyway? This is LKML, we're kernel devs.
>

Heh! agreed, but we are a small population and moreover a large
population would benefit from systemd and parallel boot.
 
> > I am not sure why CONFIG_CGROUP=y is so bad, Peter, could you
> > elaborate? 
> 
> Because it adds code I don't use and adds to the compile overhead.

Not anymore, if systemd becomes the default :-)


-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/