[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D53C6120ABB@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 14:28:48 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: "martin.schwidefsky@...ibm.com" <martin.schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"jlan@....com" <jlan@....com>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Use microsecond granularity for taskstats accounting
You delete the only users of cputime_to_msecs() ... should
you also delete the definition from asm-generic/cputime.h?
Same for the msecs_to_cputime() that had no users.
Is it worth adding the usecs_to_cputime() functions/macros.
Symmetry is nice (and matches what used to be there, but
unused code isn't very worthwhile.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists