linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/37] lmb: Add lmb_find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BEDD7D4.90002@oracle.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 May 2010 16:08:04 -0700
From:	Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/37] lmb: Add lmb_find_area()

On 05/14/2010 03:39 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 12:45 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> it is a wrapper for lmb_find_base
>>
>> make it more easy for x86 to use lmb. ( rebase )
>> x86 early_res is using find/reserve pattern instead of alloc.
>>
>> keep it in weak version, so later We can use x86 own version if needed.
>> also We need it in lib/lmb.c, so one called mm/page_alloc.c could get compiled
> 
> I seem to have told you that I didn't want to have that thing in the
> core :-)
> 
> You keep adding those "wrappers" which basically just do prototype
> adaptation and in this case a bit of cropping, with a name that is
> utterly confusing as to what their intent is.
> 
> I might have accepted that one if you had called it something like
> lmb_find_in_range() which at least -means- something.

thanks. will use sed to replace them.

lmb_find_area ==> lmb_find_in_range()

how about
lmb_reserve_area  ==> lmb_reserve_range
lmb_free_area  ==> lmb_free_range
or leave them that way, later replace them lmb_reserve and lmb_free one by one?

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/