[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BEDDACD.9040704@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 16:20:45 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
CC: Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Mike Habeck <habeck@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/1] x86 pci: Add option to not assign BAR's if not already
assigned
On 05/14/2010 03:47 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
> Wow and they're using cards that want to use I/O space? Funky. It's
> too late to get this into 2.6.34, but that can't be what you were
> expecting... I don't see a problem with getting something like this in
> for 2.6.35.
>
Most cards on the market provide I/O BARs as a convenience to legacy
BIOSes; they don't need the I/O BAR functionality from inside a
full-featured OS. There are a few, key, exceptions, mainly in the form
of legacy-interface devices like UARTs and VGA (note that VGA has its
own routing bits and is therefore unaffected by this problem.)
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists