[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100514021129.GE4381@shaohui>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 10:11:29 +0800
From: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com,
shaohui.zheng@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC, 3/7] NUMA hotplug emulator
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:01:35AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:45:35AM +0800, Zheng, Shaohui wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 09:55:11AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 07:48:35PM +0800, Shaohui Zheng wrote:
> > > > Userland interface to hotplug-add fake offlined nodes.
> > >
> > > Why include 2 copies of the patch in one email?
> > I always try to attach the patch as attachment, it is the same with the mail
> > content, I guess it should take convenience when you need to save the patch
> > to local, it might be a bad habbit, I will be careful when I send patch next time.
> > thanks for the reminding.
>
> Shaohui, git/quilt are great tools for submitting patch series.
Thanks fengguang, I am the new fish in LKML, so I send the patches manually one by
one, I will try this tool next time.
>
> > >
> > > > Add a sysfs entry "probe" under /sys/devices/system/node/:
> > > >
> > > > - to show all fake offlined nodes:
> > > > $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/probe
> > > >
> > > > - to hotadd a fake offlined node, e.g. nodeid is N:
> > > > $ echo N > /sys/devices/system/node/probe
> > >
> > > As you are trying to add a new sysfs file, please create the matching
> > > Documentation/ABI/ file as well.
> >
> > Agree, We will document it in.
> >
> > >
> > > Also note that sysfs files are "one value per file", which I don't think
> > > this file follows, right?
> >
> > Agree, the cpu/probe interface should write only, and we should create another
> > file to indicate the hidden nodes, such as cpu/hidden. We will follow this rule
> > when we send the formal patch.
>
> I'd prefer to avoid new interfaces if not absolutely necessary.
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
--
Thanks & Regards,
Shaohui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists