lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BEEEEBA.9050506@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 15 May 2010 20:58:02 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
CC:	jeff@...zik.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ben@...adent.org.uk,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] block,ide: simplify bdops->set_capacity() to ->unlock_native_capacity()

Hello, Bartlomiej.

On 05/15/2010 08:48 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> This seems to rely on an optimistic assumption that command execution
> will always be successful and that no errors on disk or host level can
> ever happen..
>
> [ The assumption in question was introduced in the previous patch:
...
> originally if the command execution failed the 'capacity' would be 0 ]

Hmm... nothing really changes by this tho.  Whether unlocking succeeds
or not, the block layer will revalidate the disk and the state at that
point will be taken as the configuration to use.  There really is
nothing much else to do.  You try unlocking, if it unlocks, use new
capacity.  If unlocking fails, revalidation will report the limited
size and block layer will have to use that.  If the device dies due to
the unlocking attempt, well, the device is dead all the same.

> It also seems that the original code could be improved a lot to handle
> (very unlikely but not impossible) error situations better..

If retry is deemed necessary, it's best handled inside the per-driver
unlock handler.  I don't think pushing EH logic upto block layer in
this case would be a good idea.  Block layer is basically telling the
driver "do whatever you can do to unlock the native capacity, when
you're done, I'll restart from the beginning".

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ