[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1273929727.2564.7.camel@localhost>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:22:07 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] libata: implement ->set_capacity()
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 17:56 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Jens, James, Jeff,
>
> This patchset implements ->set_capacity() in libata so that HPA can be
> unlocked on demand.
Thanks Tejun.
> 0001-block-restart-partition-scan-after-resizing-a-device.patch
> 0002-SCSI-implement-sd_set_capacity.patch
> 0003-libata-use-the-enlarged-capacity-after-late-HPA-unlo.patch
> 0004-libata-implement-on-demand-HPA-unlocking.patch
>
> 0001 makes partition scan code to restart after ->set_capacity().
> This makes sure that partitions which start beyond the HPA limit are
> discovered.
>
> 0002 implements ->set_capacity() in sd.
>
> 0003 makes libata accept device capacity larger than the initial one.
>
> 0004 implements ->set_capacity() in libata which asks libata EH to
> unlock HPA, waits and returns the new capacity.
>
> Ben Hutchings suggeseted implementing ->set_capacity() in libata and
> also reported the bug in the current partition scan code where it
> fails to discover partitions which start beyond the HPA limit.
[...]
And I've already successfully tested the combination of patches 2-4.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists