lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005161055580.6573@ask.diku.dk> Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 10:58:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: ERR_PTR and PTR_ERR I see a number of occurrences of code like the following: if (IS_ERR(alg)) return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(alg)); Is there any reason why the second line couldn't just be return alg? julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/