[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100516093636.GE5133@lenovo>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 13:36:36 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lktdm: Bring support for hardlockup, softlockup and
hung task crashes
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 07:39:51AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
...
> static struct jprobe lkdtm;
> @@ -320,6 +326,20 @@ static void lkdtm_do_action(enum ctype which)
> memset(data, 0x78, len);
> break;
> }
> + case SOFTLOCKUP:
> + preempt_disable();
> + for (;;)
> + cpu_relax();
> + break;
> + case HARDLOCKUP:
> + local_irq_disable();
> + for (;;)
> + cpu_relax();
> + break;
> + case HUNG_TASK:
> + set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> + schedule();
> + break;
> case NONE:
> default:
> break;
Looks good to me. Btw perhaps we may simplify it a bit:
case HARDLOCKUP:
local_irq_disable();
case SOFTLOCKUP:
preempt_disable();
for (;;)
cpu_relax();
break;
since it'll save a few bytes. What do you think? Did I miss
something?
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists