linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] hwmon: Update coretemp to current Intel processors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100517094136.094800562@osadl.org>
Date:	Mon, 17 May 2010 11:41:36 +0200
From:	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, Huaxu Wan <huaxu.wan@...el.com>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
	LM Sensors <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] hwmon: Update coretemp to current Intel processors

Hi!

Here comes the current version of the coretemp patches. Huaxu did the initial
work; Jean suggested to submit them directly to Andrew.

I made some style changes as advised by checkpatch.

The patches have been tested successfully on Core 2 Duo and Quad, and on
Nehalem and Nehalem/Westmere where temperature readings were plausible and
changed with load as expected. When tested on an Atom processor (N270), the
temperature values were identical to previous versions of the coretemp
module and also changed with load. However, the readings should be higher
by 10 to 15C as compared to the outside temperature of the processor. Huaxu,
could you check? I would guess TjMax to be 105 instead of 90C in these
processors.

        Carsten.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/