[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005171303260.21420@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 13:04:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
paulus@...ba.org, davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com,
acme@...radead.org, perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix errors path in perf_output_begin()
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> In case the sampling buffer has no "payload" pages, nr_pages is 0.
> The problem is that the error path in perf_output_begin() skips to
> a label which assumes perf_output_lock() has been issued which is
> not the case. That triggers a WARN_ON() is perf_output_unlock().
>
> This patch fixes the problem by adding a new label and skipping
> perf_task_unlock() in case data->nr_pages is 0.
It does? Your code looks good to me, but the description above is
a little flawed, since no new label is added.
Thanks
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
>
> --
> diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
> index a4fa381..95137b6 100644
> --- a/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -3035,8 +3035,10 @@ int perf_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
> handle->nmi = nmi;
> handle->sample = sample;
>
> - if (!data->nr_pages)
> - goto fail;
> + if (!data->nr_pages) {
> + atomic_inc(&data->lost);
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> have_lost = atomic_read(&data->lost);
> if (have_lost)
> --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists