[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100517112937.GA5291@nowhere>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 13:29:40 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
paulus@...ba.org, davem@...emloft.net, acme@...radead.org,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix bug mismatch with -c option definition
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:04:01PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> The -c option defines the user requested sampling period. It was implemented
> using an unsigned int variable but the type of the option was OPT_LONG. Thus,
> the option parser was overwriting memory belonging to other variables, namely
> the mmap_pages leading to a zero page sampling buffer. The bug was exposed
> only when compiling at -O0, probably because the compiler was padding
> variables at higher optimization levels.
>
> This patch fixes this problem by declaring user_interval as u64. This also
> avoids wrap-around issues for large period on 32-bit systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Small detail: could you avoid the spaces in the beginning of
your changelog lines?
May be that's because you use git-show to dump your patches?
In which case I suggest you to use git-format-patch instead.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists