[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274105441.6930.6920.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:10:41 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@...nd.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mtd: Do not corrupt backing device of device node
inode
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 16:55 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> + if (!mtd->inode) {
> + struct inode *mtd_inode;
> + mtd_inode = new_inode(mtd_inode_mnt->mnt_sb);
> + if (!mtd_inode) {
> + put_mtd_device(mtd);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + mtd_inode->i_mode = S_IFCHR;
> + mtd_inode->i_rdev = inode->i_rdev;
> + if (mtd->backing_dev_info) {
> + mtd_inode->i_data.backing_dev_info =
> + mtd->backing_dev_info;
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(cmpxchg(&mtd->inode, NULL, mtd_inode))) {
> + /* Somebody has already initialized mtd->inode
> */
> + iput(mtd_inode);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + igrab(mtd->inode);
Now you're just reimplementing iget().
Can we just use iget_locked() to get the appropriate inode (using the
mtd device number as the inode number)? Then we don't need to bother
storing it in mtd->inode at all, and we can iput() the last refcount on
it when the chardevice is closed -- we don't need it to stick around
until the MTD device is destroyed.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists