[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF15F08.5050108@osadl.org>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 17:21:44 +0200
From: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fix-task-states-in-sched_switch-event.patch
Hi Peter,
>> #define TASK_RUNNING 0
>> +#define TASK_STATE_0 "R"
>> +#define TASK_STATE_NAME_0 "running"
>> +
>> #define TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE 1
>> +#define TASK_STATE_1 "S"
>> +#define TASK_STATE_NAME_1 "sleeping"
>> +
>> #define TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE 2
>> +#define TASK_STATE_2 "D"
>> +#define TASK_STATE_NAME_2 "disk sleep"
>> +
>> #define __TASK_STOPPED 4
>> +#define TASK_STATE_4 "T"
>> +#define TASK_STATE_NAME_4 "stopped"
>> +
>> #define __TASK_TRACED 8
>> +#define TASK_STATE_8 "t"
>> +#define TASK_STATE_NAME_8 "tracing stop"
>> +
>> /* in tsk->exit_state */
>> #define EXIT_ZOMBIE 16
>> +#define TASK_STATE_16 "Z"
>> +#define TASK_STATE_NAME_16 "zombie"
>> +
>> #define EXIT_DEAD 32
>> +#define TASK_STATE_32 "X"
>> +#define TASK_STATE_NAME_32 "dead"
>> +
>> /* in tsk->state again */
>> #define TASK_DEAD 64
>> +#define TASK_STATE_64 "x"
>> +#define TASK_STATE_NAME_64 "dead"
>> +
>> #define TASK_WAKEKILL 128
>> +#define TASK_STATE_128 "K"
>> +#define TASK_STATE_NAME_128 "wakekill"
>> +
>> #define TASK_WAKING 256
>> +#define TASK_STATE_256 "W"
>> +#define TASK_STATE_NAME_256 "waking"
>
> Since we all love vile macro magic, is the below any better?
>
> include/linux/task_states.h
>
> TASK_STATE(RUNNING, "R", "running")
> TASK_STATE(INTERRUPTIBLE, "S", "sleeping")
> ...
Well, yes, this looks very nice and is perfectly readable and
maintainable.
> enum {
> #define TASK_STATE(tstate, tstate_c, tstate_s) __TASK_##tstate,
> #include<linux/task_states.h>
> #undef TASK_STATE
> };
>
> enum {
> #define TASK_STATE(tstate, tstate_c, tstate_s) \
> TASK_##tstate = 1<< __TASK_##tstate,
> #include<linux/task_states.h>
> #undef TASK_STATE
> };
>
> const char *task_state_to_char =
> #define TASK_STATE(tstate, tstate_c, tstate_s) tstate_c
> #include<linux/task_states.h>
> #undef TASK_STATE
> ;
>
> const char *task_state_to_string[] = {
> #define TASK_STATE(tstate, tstate_c, tstate_s) tstate_s,
> #include<linux/task_states.h>
> #undef TASK_STATE
> };
I find this section less convincing (although certainly
indistinguishable from magic).
In addition, we need to take care of the various state name prefixes
TASK, __TASK and EXIT and name clashes:
TASK_RUNNING
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
__TASK_STOPPED
__TASK_TRACED
EXIT_ZOMBIE
EXIT_DEAD
TASK_DEAD
TASK_WAKEKILL
TASK_WAKING
And we still need to maintain the defines in include/trace/events/
sched.h:
{ 1, TASK_STATE_1 } , { 2, TASK_STATE_2 },
{ 4, TASK_STATE_4 }, { 8, TASK_STATE_8 },
{ 16, TASK_STATE_16 }, { 32, TASK_STATE_32 },
{ 64, TASK_STATE_64 }, { 128, TASK_STATE_128 },
{ 256, TASK_STATE_256 }
) : TASK_STATE_0,
If we could use a general approach for all states, I would immediately
go for your proposal. But since we anyway need to define the states
individually, I would vote for the current version of the patch.
Or would you prefer to simply apply a minimal fix to correct the
erroneous output of the sched_switch event and to leave the rest as an
exercise for the future?
Carsten.
View attachment "fix-just-task-states-in-sched_switch-event.patch" of type "text/plain" (604 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists