[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CEE6BB42CAD6E947908279175AF8470A025A726240@EXDCVYMBSTM006.EQ1STM.local>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 22:38:53 +0200
From: Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
To: Sundar R IYER <sundar.iyer@...ricsson.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Deepak Sikri <deepak.sikri79@...il.com>,
Viresh KUMAR <viresh.kumar@...com>,
Rajeev KUMAR <rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com>,
Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vipin KUMAR <vipin.kumar@...com>,
Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@...com>,
"linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux <STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com>
Subject: RE: [linux-pm] Power Domain Framework
[Sundar]
> This is one of the most important aspect for such a change in the
> regulator framework: bringing in the domain aspect can encourage all
> newer (possibly older) architectures to come under a generic umbrella.
I have the same view, and I've been enouraging Sundar to bring this
discussion with the community in order to avoid code duplication.
Of course we can start inventing our own power-domain machine
like everyone else, but before we do that, let's atleast try to
do something generic, so bear with us...
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists