linux-kernel - RE: [linux-pm] Power Domain Framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CEE6BB42CAD6E947908279175AF8470A025A72624A@EXDCVYMBSTM006.EQ1STM.local>
Date:	Mon, 17 May 2010 23:46:38 +0200
From:	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Sundar R IYER <sundar.iyer@...ricsson.com>,
	Deepak Sikri <deepak.sikri79@...il.com>,
	Viresh KUMAR <viresh.kumar@...com>,
	Rajeev KUMAR <rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com>,
	Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vipin KUMAR <vipin.kumar@...com>,
	Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@...com>,
	"linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux <STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com>
Subject: RE: [linux-pm] Power Domain Framework

[Mark]

> I do agree that separating out the common bits of power
> domain implementation would be good, my concerns here are around the
> level of integration with the regulator API.

The plenty talk about power domains in
Documentation/power/regulators/overview.txt
was what got us started in this regulator direction from the
beginning.

Anyhow: it will certainly be closely related even if we come
up with some different API for power domains so we're in the
right forum.

Linus