lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 17 May 2010 23:50:06 +0200
From:	Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <ken@...elabs.ch>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	michael-dev@...i-braun.de, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto

Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 02:33, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:24:41PM +0100, michael-dev@...i-braun.de wrote:
>>> Pekka Enberg schrieb:
>>>> Even with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB enabled or with CONFIG_SLUB and
>>>> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON?
>>> no, these options have not been / are not enabled.
>> Can you please try it with those options enabled? That will tell
>> us if there is some latent bug in the crypto layer that only shows
>> up right away under SLOB.
> 
> After seeing a posting from Nemoto-san on the linux-mips list (should
> show up soon on
> http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2010-05/threads.html),
> I'm wondering if these defaults are the culprit;
> 
> mm/slab.c:#define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)
> mm/slob.c:#define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long)
> mm/slub.c:#define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)

Just a quick note: I changed this line in mm/slob.c to (unsigned long
long) and was able to load tcrypt without the kernel oopsing or
panic'ing. When running all test via

modprobe tcrypt

the tests seem to pass fine judging by /proc/crypto. Nevertheless module
insertion fails (as expected) but does not return EAGAIN but EMULTIHOP
instead...

Regards,
Adrian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ