[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sk5qw4vf.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:16:52 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 7)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> writes:
> On Monday 17 May 2010, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> PM: Add opportunistic suspend support.
>
> "PM: Opportunistic suspend support" would be sufficient IMO.
>
> Now, I'd start with the motivation. Like "Power management features present
> in the current mainline kernel are insufficient to get maximum possible energy
> savings on some platforms, such as Android, because ..." (here go explanations
> why this is the case in your opinion).
Yes, this will be helpful.
> Next, "To allow Android and similar platforms to save more energy than they
> currently can save using the mainline kernel, introduce a mechanism by which
> the system is automatically suspended (i.e. put into a system-wide sleep state)
> whenever it's not doing useful work, called opportunistic suspend".
Hopefully, a definition of "useful" will be given here, including by
what standards on-going work is determined not to be useful.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists