[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF1C2B0.6040700@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 15:26:56 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area_overlap_ok()
On 05/17/2010 03:01 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 10:18 -0700, Yinghai wrote:
>>> No. Both will hit 2.6.36. It's way too late to queue up such changes
>> for
>>> the 2.6.35 merge window which has already opened.
>>
>> i have feeling that your new LMB code will hit 2.6.36. and
>> x86 patches that is using to lmb will hit 2.6.37.
>>
>> otherwise it will make more merge conflicts between tip and lmb.
>> unless put your lmb change to tip?
>
> There is no reason not to, I'll have them in a separate branch that Ingo
> can pull. I think we can aim for 2.6.36 in one go provided that Peter
> and Thomas are happy with the x86 side of things.
>
Yes, that's the sane thing to do at this point.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists