[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-0db1a7bc00216a981d0b7056627ad8682f4f0636@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 06:33:40 GMT
From: tip-bot for Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...hat.com, gorcunov@...nvz.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
gorcunov@...il.com, ming.m.lin@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf, x86: P4 PMU -- handle unflagged events
Commit-ID: 0db1a7bc00216a981d0b7056627ad8682f4f0636
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0db1a7bc00216a981d0b7056627ad8682f4f0636
Author: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 17 May 2010 16:13:04 +0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:25:34 +0200
perf, x86: P4 PMU -- handle unflagged events
It might happen that an event can overflow without
the proper overflow flag set. Check the sign bit in
the raw counter value to solve this problem.
Tested-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: fweisbec@...il.com
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
LKML-Reference: <1274083984.6540.15.camel@...ggr.sh.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
index 424fc8d..02f0728 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
@@ -465,15 +465,21 @@ out:
return rc;
}
-static inline void p4_pmu_clear_cccr_ovf(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
+static inline int p4_pmu_clear_cccr_ovf(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
{
- unsigned long dummy;
+ int overflow = 0;
+ u32 low, high;
- rdmsrl(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx, dummy);
- if (dummy & P4_CCCR_OVF) {
+ rdmsr(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx, low, high);
+
+ /* we need to check high bit for unflagged overflows */
+ if ((low & P4_CCCR_OVF) || (high & (1 << 31))) {
+ overflow = 1;
(void)checking_wrmsrl(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx,
- ((u64)dummy) & ~P4_CCCR_OVF);
+ ((u64)low) & ~P4_CCCR_OVF);
}
+
+ return overflow;
}
static inline void p4_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -584,21 +590,15 @@ static int p4_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
WARN_ON_ONCE(hwc->idx != idx);
- /*
- * FIXME: Redundant call, actually not needed
- * but just to check if we're screwed
- */
- p4_pmu_clear_cccr_ovf(hwc);
+ /* it might be unflagged overflow */
+ handled = p4_pmu_clear_cccr_ovf(hwc);
val = x86_perf_event_update(event);
- if (val & (1ULL << (x86_pmu.cntval_bits - 1)))
+ if (!handled && (val & (1ULL << (x86_pmu.cntval_bits - 1))))
continue;
- /*
- * event overflow
- */
- handled = 1;
- data.period = event->hw.last_period;
+ /* event overflow for sure */
+ data.period = event->hw.last_period;
if (!x86_perf_event_set_period(event))
continue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists