[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinkel3TW8cCY3YCIw_savLuwcQKR67ebX7EmmSU@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 14:41:35 +0800
From: Steven Liu <lingjiujianke@...il.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix a code style in drivers/char/virtio_console.c
okay, i see, thanks for your regards :)
2010/5/18 Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>:
> Hello,
>
> On (Tue) May 18 2010 [13:41:29], Steven Liu wrote:
>> Hi, Amit,
>>
>> if 'err' initialised in this path, it needn't do err = -ENOMEM
>> after,isn't it?
>
> What I mean is if we later add some code that just does:
>
> if (err)
> goto fail;
>
> then 'ret' can be -ENOMEM, as it was initialised to, which would be
> fine. But if a later patch adds something like:
>
> + ret = -EIO;
> + err = ...
> + if (err)
> + goto fail;
> +
> err = ...
> if (err)
> goto fail;
>
> In this case, the 2nd if() would now return EIO instead of ENOMEM as
> earlier.
>
> Also, this style of coding can prevent uninitialised usage of 'ret', eg:
>
>
> int ret;
>
> if (err)
> goto fail;
>
> fail:
> return ret;
>
> In this case, the compiler will warn about 'ret' being used
> uninitialised.
>
> This is just a coding style issue. I had initially coded it the way your
> patch does, but Rusty asked me to change that and I like this new style
> better: there's less scope for surprises.
>
> Amit
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists