[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274196233.5605.8169.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 17:23:53 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Pierre Tardy <tardyp@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...radead.org,
ziga.mahkovec@...il.com, davem <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tracer Ring Buffer splice() vs page cache [was: Re: Perf
and ftrace [was Re: PyTimechart]]
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:16 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Also, suppose it was still in the page-cache and still dirty, a steal()
> > would then punch a hole in the file.
>
> page_cache_pipe_buf_steal starts by doing a wait_on_page_writeback(page); and
> then does a try_to_release_page(page, GFP_KERNEL). Only if that succeeds is the
> action of stealing succeeding.
If you're going to wait for writeback I don't really see the advantage
of stealing over simply allocating a new page.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists