linux-kernel - Re: Conflict between tip/tracing/core and tip/perf/core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1274149985.26328.724.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 May 2010 22:33:05 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Conflict between tip/tracing/core and tip/perf/core

On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 04:28 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 02:50:42PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> 
> Yep, no problem with it,
> 
> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> 

Thanks guys! I'll get it ready to push out soon.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/