[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100518183858.GE5081@lenovo>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:38:58 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"eranian@...il.com" <eranian@...il.com>,
"Gary.Mohr@...l.com" <Gary.Mohr@...l.com>,
"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@...ibm.com>,
Carl Love <carll@...ibm.com>,
"greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 02/11] perf: core, add pmu register and lookup
functions
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:45:02AM +0000, Lin Ming wrote:
...
> +int perf_event_register_pmu(struct pmu *pmu)
> +{
> + struct pmu *tmp;
> + int ret = 1;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp, &pmus, entry) {
> + if (tmp->id == pmu->id) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto err;
Hi Ming, is it supposed to get out in locked state?
I mean imbalanced rcu_read_lock somehow suspicicous ;)
> + }
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + spin_lock(&pmus_lock);
> + list_add_tail_rcu(&pmu->entry, &pmus);
> + spin_unlock(&pmus_lock);
> +
> +err:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
...
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists