lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 18 May 2010 13:43:12 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, avi@...hat.com,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/fpu] x86: Add new static_cpu_has() function using alternatives

On 05/18/2010 01:10 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 12 mai 2010 à 01:06 +0000, tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin a
> écrit :
>> Commit-ID:  a3c8acd04376d604370dcb6cd2143c9c14078a50
>> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/a3c8acd04376d604370dcb6cd2143c9c14078a50
>> Author:     H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
>> AuthorDate: Tue, 11 May 2010 17:47:07 -0700
>> Committer:  H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
>> CommitDate: Tue, 11 May 2010 17:47:07 -0700
>>
>> x86: Add new static_cpu_has() function using alternatives
>>
>> For CPU-feature-specific code that touches performance-critical paths,
>> introduce a static patching version of [boot_]cpu_has().  This is run
>> at alternatives time and is therefore not appropriate for most
>> initialization code, but on the other hand initialization code is
>> generally not performance critical.
>>
>> On gcc 4.5+ this uses the new "asm goto" feature.
> 
> Might be time to change Documentation/Changes about gcc requirements ...
> 

Well, this failure is in the fallback code.  What this seems to imply is
that gcc 3.4.6 doesn't know how to propagate what is already known to be
constant in an inline into an immediate.  This is a pretty big fail, and
yes, if it really is this broken it might just be time to declare gcc
3.4 dead.

> # make
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
>   CHK     include/generated/utsrelease.h
>   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>   CHK     include/generated/compile.h
>   CC      arch/x86/kernel/process_32.o
> /usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h: In function
> `prepare_to_copy':
> /usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:315: warning: asm
> operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints
> /usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:315: error:
> impossible constraint in `asm'
> /usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:313: warning:
> 'flag' might be used uninitialized in this function
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/process_32.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
> make: *** [arch/x86] Error 2
> # gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/specs
> Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
> --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
> --disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
> --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-java-awt=gtk
> --host=i386-redhat-linux
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-10)
> 

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ