linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the fsnotify tree with the vfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100518151037.69226b52.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 18 May 2010 15:10:37 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the fsnotify tree with the vfs tree

Hi Eric,

Today's linux-next merge of the fsnotify tree got a conflict in
fs/notify/inotify/inotify.c between commits
f3ffc7acb6a6ebec0a9e660d9211ed048d7e90f5 ("get rid of S_BIAS") and
73b38e074b51e5d8d2801691dff6e403631e927f ("Saner locking around
deactivate_super()") from the vfs tree and commit
b6bacae18f2f7722df9e8e516ed77b2815bd1ac7 ("inotify: remove inotify in
kernel interface") from the fsnotify tree.

The latter just removed the file, so I did that as well.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped