[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100519062832.GB21294@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 08:28:32 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf stat: add perf stat -B to pretty print large
numbers
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org> wrote:
> From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
>
> It is hard to read very large numbers so provide an
> option to perf stat to separate thousands using a
> separator. The patch leverages the locale support of
> stdio. You need to set your LC_NUMERIC appropriately,
> for instance LC_NUMERIC=en_US.UTF8. You need to pass -B
> to activate this feature. This way existing scripts
> parsing the output do not need to be changed. Here is an
> example.
I've pulled it, but IMO we should go one step further:
this feature should be made unconditional. The current
numbers displayed by perf stat are often human-unreadable.
scripts should not parse pretty-printed output.
We used to have something like that, in the form of:
perf record --no-samples --stat -e cycles -e instructions -a sleep 1
perf report -n -t :
But the Newt changes broke this stat-only recording mode.
Furthermore, there should be a --raw kind out output mode
for perf stat as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists