[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100519070919.GA9618@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:09:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
"Young, Brent" <brent.young@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Hardware Error Kernel Mini-Summit
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org> wrote:
> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Date: Tue, May 18, 2010 at 09:14:09PM -0400
>
> > - Errors that occur frequently. That is broken
> > hardware of one time or another. I want to know
> > about that so I can schedule down time to replace my
> > memory before I get an uncorrected ECC error.
> > Errors of this kind are likely happening frequently
> > enough as to impact performance.
>
> This is exactly the reason why we need a better error
> logging and reporting than a log.
>
> [ ... lots of specific details snipped ... ]
Basically the idea behind the generic structured logging
framework (the perf events kernel subsystem) is to have
both ASCII output (where desired: critical errors), but to
also have well-specified event format parsable to
user-space tools.
Plus there's the need for fast, lightweight, flexible
event passing mechanism - which is given by the perf
events transport which enables arbitrary size in-memory
ring-buffers, poll() and epoll support, etc.
perf events supports all these different usecases and
comes with a (constantly growing) set of events already
defined upstream. We've got more than a dozen different
upstream subsystems that have defined events and we have
over a hundred individual events. There's a rapidly
growing tool space that makes case by case use of these
event sources to measure/observe various aspects of the
system.
Regarding dmesg, there's a WIP patch on lkml that
integrates printks into this framework as well - makes
each printk also available as a special string event.
That way a tool can have both programmatic access to
printk output (without having to interact with the syslog
buffer itself) - together with all the other structured
log sources, while humans can also see what is happening.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists