linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] perf: Implement perf_output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 May 2010 09:21:40 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] perf: Implement perf_output_addr()

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:33:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> perf_output_addr() will, for space allocated using PO_LINEAR, allow
> one to get a linear address for writing its data to.
> 
> Tracepoints tend to want to do this, although when there is need to
> multiplex the events it is of course possible that each event will get
> different data due to having to construct the event multiple times.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> ---


I'm still not sure what you mean here by this multiplexing. Is
this about per cpu multiplexing?

There is another problem. We need something like
perf_output_discard() in case the filter reject the event (which
must be filled for this check to happen).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/