[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274257885.5605.10289.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 10:31:25 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, efault@....de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/ftrace: Optimize perf/tracepoint
interaction for single events
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 10:23 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Yeah, then if you launch perf sched for example, you'll have NR_CPU perf events
> attached to each lock trace events, since we create one event per cpu.
Right, but simple per task (non-inherited) would have only 1.
But yeah, plenty of room to improve here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists