linux-kernel - Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 0/2] hwmon: Update coretemp to current Intel processors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100519005032.GA26906@owl>
Date:	Wed, 19 May 2010 08:50:32 +0800
From:	Huaxu Wan <huaxu.wan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Dmitry Gromov <gromovd@...il.com>
Cc:	"Wan, Huaxu" <huaxu.wan@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LM Sensors <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 0/2] hwmon: Update coretemp to current
 Intel processors

On 02:45 Tue 18 May, Dmitry Gromov wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> And 90C seems to be good for N200 series of Atom CPUs only - I could not
> find TjMax value published for N330 Dual Core  (quite popular one). Intel
> only published Tcase for it:
> http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=35641
> So, if for N270 Tcase = TjMax = 90C, then, I'd suggest to use Tcase = 85.2C
> for N330 TjMax value.

Quoted a sentence from [1], "Unless specified otherwise, all specifications for 
the processor are at TJ = 90°C", I believe the TjMax of 330 is 90C too.

[1]http://download.intel.com/design/processor/datashts/320528.pdf

Thanks
Huaxu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/