linux-kernel - [PATCH] schedule: simplify the reacquire_kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100519125711.GA30199@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 May 2010 14:57:11 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] schedule: simplify the reacquire_kernel_lock() logic

- Contrary to what 6d558c3a says, there is no need to reload
  prev = rq->curr after the context switch. You always schedule
  back to where you came from, prev must be equal to current
  even if cpu/rq was changed.

- This also means reacquire_kernel_lock() can use prev instead
  of current.

- No need to reassign switch_count if reacquire_kernel_lock()
  reports need_resched(), we can just move the initial assignment
  down, under the "need_resched_nonpreemptible:" label.

- Try to update the comment after context_switch().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---

 kernel/sched.c |   13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- 34-rc1/kernel/sched.c~SCHEDULE_PREV_EQ_TO_CURRENT	2010-05-18 23:32:50.000000000 +0200
+++ 34-rc1/kernel/sched.c	2010-05-19 14:32:57.000000000 +0200
@@ -3679,7 +3679,6 @@ need_resched:
 	rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 	rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
 	prev = rq->curr;
-	switch_count = &prev->nivcsw;
 
 	release_kernel_lock(prev);
 need_resched_nonpreemptible:
@@ -3693,6 +3692,7 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
 	update_rq_clock(rq);
 	clear_tsk_need_resched(prev);
 
+	switch_count = &prev->nivcsw;
 	if (prev->state && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {
 		if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev)))
 			prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
@@ -3719,8 +3719,10 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
 
 		context_switch(rq, prev, next); /* unlocks the rq */
 		/*
-		 * the context switch might have flipped the stack from under
-		 * us, hence refresh the local variables.
+		 * The context switch have flipped the stack from under us
+		 * and restored the local variables which were saved when
+		 * this task called schedule() in the past. prev == current
+		 * is still correct, but it can be moved to another cpu/rq.
 		 */
 		cpu = smp_processor_id();
 		rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
@@ -3729,11 +3731,8 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
 
 	post_schedule(rq);
 
-	if (unlikely(reacquire_kernel_lock(current) < 0)) {
-		prev = rq->curr;
-		switch_count = &prev->nivcsw;
+	if (unlikely(reacquire_kernel_lock(prev)))
 		goto need_resched_nonpreemptible;
-	}
 
 	preempt_enable_no_resched();
 	if (need_resched())

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/