linux-kernel - Re: Does anyone care about gcc 3.x support for *x86* anymore?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871vd8xb8t.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date:	Wed, 19 May 2010 15:38:26 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Siddha\, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Does anyone care about gcc 3.x support for *x86* anymore?

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
>
> If there isn't a reason to preserve support, I would like to consider
> discontinue support for using gcc 3 to compile x86 kernels.  If there is
> a valid use case, it would be good to know what it is.

I suspect there are still distributions around that use it as a standard
compiler. Wasn't it used in some major release of Debian?

-Andi
-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/