linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT] ehea: make receive irq handler non-threaded (IRQF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BF3F2DB.7030701@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 May 2010 07:16:59 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
To:	michael@...erman.id.au
CC:	Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>,
	dvhltc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@...t.ibm.com>,
	niv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Doug Maxey <doug.maxey@...ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] ehea: make receive irq handler non-threaded (IRQF_NODELAY)

On 05/18/2010 06:25 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 15:22 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>> On 05/18/2010 02:52 PM, Brian King wrote:
>>> Is IRQF_NODELAY something specific to the RT kernel? I don't see it in mainline...
>>
>> Yes, it basically says "don't make this handler threaded".
>
> That is a good fix for EHEA, but the threaded handling is still broken
> for anything else that is edge triggered isn't it?

No, I don't believe so. Edge triggered interrupts that are reported as 
edge triggered interrupts will use the edge handler (which was the 
approach Sebastien took to make this work back in 2008). Since XICS 
presents all interrupts as Level Triggered, they use the fasteoi path.

>
> The result of the discussion about two years ago on this was that we
> needed a custom flow handler for XICS on RT.

I'm still not clear on why the ultimate solution wasn't to have XICS 
report edge triggered as edge triggered. Probably some complexity of the 
entire power stack that I am ignorant of.

> Apart from the issue of loosing interrupts there is also the fact that
> masking on the XICS requires an RTAS call which takes a global lock.

Right, one of may reasons why we felt this was the right fix. The other 
is that there is no real additional overhead in running this as 
non-threaded since the receive handler is so short (just napi_schedule()).

-- 
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/