linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] dm: only initialize full request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100519144542.GD24618@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 May 2010 10:45:42 -0400
From:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To:	Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
Cc:	Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] dm: only initialize full request_queue for
 request-based device

On Wed, May 19 2010 at 10:39am -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> wrote:

> > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > dm_table_setup_md_queue() may allocate memory with blocking mode.
> > > Blocking allocation inside exclusive _hash_lock can cause deadlock;
> > > e.g. when it has to wait for other dm devices to resume to free some
> > > memory.

<snip>

> We discussed this and I understand the scope of the problem now.
> 
> Just reiterating what you covered when you first pointed this issue out:
> 
> It could be that a table load gets blocked (waiting on a memory
> allocation).  The table load can take as long as it needs.  But we can't
> have it block holding the exclusive _hash_lock while blocking.  Having
> _hash_lock prevents further DM ioctls.  The table load's allocation may
> be blocking waiting for writeback to a DM device that will be resumed by
> another thread.
> 
> Thanks again for pointing this out; I'll work to arrive at an
> alternative locking scheme.  Likely introduce a lock local to the
> multiple_device (effectively the 'queue_lock' I had before).  But

s/multiple_device/mapped_device/

Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/