[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274343159.5605.13325.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 10:12:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ego@...ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/7] softirq: avoid softirq_work_list for SCHED_SOFTIRQ
when sent remotely
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:27 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> plain text document attachment
> (fix_local_trigger_remote_softirq_for_sched.patch)
> There is no need to add the SCHED_SOFTIRQ work to the softirq_work_list
> when sent remotely. This is because any pending work associated with
> SCHED_SOFTIRQ need not be migrated to a new cpu when the current cpu is
> going down etc.
>
> Also I am not sure how this softirq_work_list works for other softirqs.
> I don't see anyone removing the list entries from the softirq_work_list
> after it is handled on a remote cpu.
Most odd all that, Dave, Jens, what happened to all that remote_softirq
stuff?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists